关键词

比较教育；教育制度；创新能力；国际学生评估项目（PISA）；教育政策；跨文化因素；教学方法；评估体系；社会文化影响；经济条件；教育技术；个性化学习；教育公平；“互联网 +”教育；国际合作

全文

PDF

参考

[1] Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and potentials. In R. J.
Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). Cambridge University Press.
[2] Zhao, Y., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and increased educational benefits.
Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 115-152.
[3] Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-Technical Manual. Personnel
Press.
[4] Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. Springer-Verlag.
[5] Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Routledge.
[6] Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2011). The economics of international differences in educational
achievement. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(1), 89-115.
[7] PISA. (2018). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing.
[8] Barab, S. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability, and talent
development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 165-
182.
[9] Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper
Collins.
[10] Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427-441.
[11] Feldhusen, J. F., Treffinger, D. J., & Isaksen, S. G. (1994). Assessing and nurturing creativity potential in
students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(3), 129-136.