您好,欢迎进入未来科学出版社官网!

用科学铸就未来,用阅读滋养人生

Use science to create the future, and use reading to nourish life

+65 6396 6190

客服服务时间:9:00-18:00

当前位置: 首页 >> 中文期刊 >> 教育理论与实践 >> 2024 >> 3

英美学前教育项目质量标准对比及其对中国的启示

作者:杨晓霞

院校:天津电子职业技术学院(天津 300350)

摘要:本文通过对比分析英国和美国的学前教育项目,探讨了两国在教育内容、教师资质、学习环境、家庭与社区参与等方面所采取的不同策略和实践。研究发现,尽管两国的教育体系存在差异,但都强调了以儿童为中心的教学方法、教师的专业发展、以及家庭和社区的积极参与。同时,本文也指出了中国学前教育在质量标准、资源分配和教师培训等方面存在的问题,并提出了借鉴英美经验的改革建议。通过对两个典型案例的深入分析,本文识别了关键的成功因素,并讨论了它们对中国学前教育的启示。最后,本文提出了一系列针对中国学前教育发展的建议,旨在提高教育质量、促进教育公平和创新教学方法。

关键词

学前教育;质量标准;英美对比;中国启示;教育政策;教师培训;资源分配;家庭社区参与

全文

PDF

参考

参考文献

[1] Department for Education. (2012). Statutory Framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage: Setting the Standards for Learning, Development and Care for Children from Birth to Five. London: DfE.

[2] United States Department of Health & Human Services. (2016). Head Start Program Performance Standards. Washington, D.C.: Administration for Children & Families.

[3] Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Sylva, K. (2004). Researching Effective Pedagogy in the Early Years. London: DfES.

[4] Stipek, D. (2002). Early Childhood Education for a Diverse Society. In B. Spodek & O. N. Saracho (Eds.), Handbook of Research on the Education of Young Children (2nd ed., pp. 95-111). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[5] National Institute for Early Education Research. (2016). The State of Preschool 2015: State Preschool Yearbook. New Brunswick, NJ: NIEER.

[6] Melhuish, E. C., & Moss, P. (Eds.). (2013). Research in Early Childhood Education: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Routledge.

[7] Whitebook, M., Howes, C., & Phillips, D. A. (2014). Worthy Work, Unlivable Wages: The Early Childhood Education and Care Workforce in Five Cities. Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Child Care Employment, University of California, Berkeley.

[8] OECD. (2012). Starting Strong III: A Quality Toolbox for Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD Publishing.

+65 6396 6190

微信二维码